Re: SRH Reorg: Why Bring In Political Biases?

• To: soc-religion-hindu@uunet.uu.net
• Subject: Re: SRH Reorg: Why Bring In Political Biases?
• From: mani@srirangam.esd.sgi.com (Mani Varadarajan)
• Date: 02 Jan 1996 20:00:25 GMT
• In-Reply-To: ntiwari@rs3.esm.vt.edu's message of 2 Jan 1996 11:38:08 GMT
• Newsgroups: soc.religion.hindu, news.groups
• Organization: Digital Media Systems, Silicon Graphics Inc.
• References: <4ba3e5$j8o@babbage.ece.uc.edu> <4bdsp2$j2n@babbage.ece.uc.edu> <4cb5f0$bng@babbage.ece.uc.edu>
• Reply-To: mani@srirangam.esd.sgi.com

In article <4cb5f0$bng@babbage.ece.uc.edu> ntiwari@rs3.esm.vt.edu (N. Tiwari) writes:
> Your post is self contradictory. The post of Partha was pretty
> political. It explicitly blamed the cow belt and VHP politics for issues 
> related to dowry. YOu somehow think that such type of mix of religion and
> politics is good, and is fit enough to be posted in s.r.h.
> 
> But when Rajiv Varma posts something similar (like the invasion of Islamic
> warriors) and explores the impact of that on the Hindus, you get pissed
> off. Things like these are obscure, and fit enough for talk.religion.hindu.

I have always maintained that neither of these posts
are appropriate for soc.religion.hindu.moderated.  I have
*never* approved in any way of the acceptance of Partha's 
posts.

Please do not put words in my mouth.

Mani

• Prev: Re: SRH reorganization
• Next: Mother Meera
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread

	This site is part of Dharma Universe LLC websites. Copyrighted 2009-2011, Dharma Universe.