Re: REQUEST : RISHIS

• To: soc-religion-hindu@uunet.uu.net
• Subject: Re: REQUEST : RISHIS
• From: maitreya@worldnet.att.net (Joseph M. Emmanuel)
• Date: Wed, 02 Oct 1996 03:33:26 GMT
• Newsgroups: soc.religion.hindu
• Organization: EDP
• References: <ghenDxu5oL.5JB@netcom.com> <ghenDxxs3x.J7t@netcom.com> <ghenDy7Ep6.7yJ@netcom.com> <ghenDy9FtI.7zK@netcom.com> <ghenDyL5Bs.ts@netcom.com>

On Tue, 1 Oct 1996 07:11:51 GMT, shrao@nyx.net (Shrisha Rao) wrote:

>>These are not flaws.  You chose to call them such.  He is also Everything.
>>So He is indeed All Forms, Names, Shapes, etc.  My God Has No Flaws:).
>
>The main point is still not answered: wherefrom did you get the notion
>that *if* there is an Omnipotent God, *then* he/she/it is formless?
>What is the basis for this inference?

Have you seen any Omnipotent God with form?

>Also, what is your notion of "flaw"?  Perhaps if we can agree upon a
>definition of the same, we can make progress towards an agreement
>whether formlessness is a flaw or not, and whether something that is
>formless can also be all forms, etc.
>
>Regards,
>
>Shrisha Rao

If it is not Perfect, it has Flaws.


       -Joseph	(maitreya@worldnet.att.net) 
         One God, One World, One Humanity
            Unity Of All Under One God
       For more information send me an email

• Prev: Re: ARTICLE : conversion ammendment to FAQ
• Next: Re: REQUEST: Mahabharata
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread

	This site is part of Dharma Universe LLC websites. Copyrighted 2009-2010, Dharma Universe.