[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: ARTICLE : Parallels/Divergences (Was Re: ARTICLE : Just say no...)
-
To: soc-religion-hindu@uunet.uu.net
-
Subject: Re: ARTICLE : Parallels/Divergences (Was Re: ARTICLE : Just say no...)
-
From: mpt0002@jove.acs.unt.edu (Michael Tandy)
-
Date: 4 Oct 1996 21:07:10 GMT
-
Newsgroups: soc.religion.hindu
-
Organization: University of North Texas
-
References: <ghenDwHznC.9A0@netcom.com> <ghenDxL7JJ.L21@netcom.com> <ghenDxoKJw.51o@netcom.com> <ghenDy1H39.2tM@netcom.com> <ghenDy7Evx.8sy@netcom.com> <ghenDyL59A.9s@netcom.com>
>>I have been following this thread for sometime to the best of my non-Hindu
>>abilities and it seems clear that "Hindu" is even less useful a label
>>than "Christian" for the purposes of serious discussion.
I myself believe that there really is no such thing as
Hinduism for just this reason; since the term has yet
to be cohesively defined, what is the sense in using it
or in trying to discuss such a "Hinduism?"
-m
