[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: ARTICLE : Just say no to "Hinduism" (was Re: ARTICLE : On attempting to define Hinduism)



Jaldhar H. Vyas (jaldhar@braincells.com) wrote:

: Aurobindo was not a scholar either.  First he was a bureaucrat, then he
: was a terrorist.  His later actions may be "admirable" but that doesn't
: make them any more relevant.  I truly admire comedian Jerry Seinfeld.  I
: certainly wouldn't be very interested in any opinion of his on the central
: verse of the Rgveda.

: It is not enough to quote someone who has an opinion.  Opinions are two a
: penny.  Try quoting someone who is part of our tradition (which dates back
: further than the 19th century you know.) or someone who meets the
: standards of critical scholarship.  (I don't accept Indology as being
: authoritative even if it agrees with tradition but at least I can respect
: it as being intellectually honest.)  If you really believe what you say
: this will require just a little mental effort.  No problem for someone who
: has the courage of their convictions.

Dear Jaldharji:

I am truly astounded by the statement that Sri Aurobindo was not a
scholar.  He began as a scholar, and ended up as the Rishhi.  I will be
very willing to put in more than a 'little mental effort' to explore with
you, how you decided that Sri Aurobindo does not 'meet the standards of
critical scholarship'.  Please be so kind to enlighten me.



: And incidentally it is by no means unanimous that religion is given to
: us by God.  The Mimamsak belief is the Veda is self-evident and 
: uncreated by any being even Bhagawan.

Please enlighten me how such a 'belief' was established, and if you would,
please give me some references about it.

With best regards,

Dhruba.



More Information about HinduNet Inc.
Privacy Statement
The Hindu Universe is a HinduNet Inc., website.
Copyrighted ©1994-2003, HinduNet Inc.